<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google Wave is already dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/why-google-wave-is-already-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/why-google-wave-is-already-dead/</link>
	<description>T.I.M. Huijbers chatting about online marketing and new media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sak</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/why-google-wave-is-already-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>sak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/?p=47#comment-31</guid>
		<description>bugger--- wave was such a brilliant idea on paper (or goog doc if you prefer).

it&#039;s limited release wasn&#039;t even done properly--- I found that the people who had it, had absolutely no need for it.

Google should have either reserved a release for people who have Google Apps, Corporations, or done a similtaneous release to public when it was ready.

i&#039;d hate to see google scrap it--- it has sooooo much potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bugger&#8212; wave was such a brilliant idea on paper (or goog doc if you prefer).</p>
<p>it&#8217;s limited release wasn&#8217;t even done properly&#8212; I found that the people who had it, had absolutely no need for it.</p>
<p>Google should have either reserved a release for people who have Google Apps, Corporations, or done a similtaneous release to public when it was ready.</p>
<p>i&#8217;d hate to see google scrap it&#8212; it has sooooo much potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Huijbers</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/why-google-wave-is-already-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Huijbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/?p=47#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Could be true as well indeed. I&#039;m thinking of Wave in a sense of replacing Email, chat etc, and not specifically for contacting new people or following new subjects, although that&#039;s also a possible use of Google Wave. 

In either case it is again &quot;Unclear how and where to use for&quot;, too many possibilities seems to make the product scary instead of usefull, it seems..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be true as well indeed. I&#8217;m thinking of Wave in a sense of replacing Email, chat etc, and not specifically for contacting new people or following new subjects, although that&#8217;s also a possible use of Google Wave. </p>
<p>In either case it is again &#8220;Unclear how and where to use for&#8221;, too many possibilities seems to make the product scary instead of usefull, it seems..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/why-google-wave-is-already-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetmarketeer.nl/?p=47#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think they launched it on the wrong time. More and more people now know how they can brand there name and product with Facebook, Twitter, enz. To much of the same. If they launched it 2 years back it would be a succes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they launched it on the wrong time. More and more people now know how they can brand there name and product with Facebook, Twitter, enz. To much of the same. If they launched it 2 years back it would be a succes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
